- 2 -
75
by me personally in connection with the Committee's report.
The Committee recommended a reversion to something much more
like the old scale, running up to the same nominal maximum
of £700, but without the right of free quarters and accordingly
with a reduction in pensionable emoluments. This was in exact
accordance with the treatment proposed for the masters and in subsidiary recommendations, e.g. for residential allowance
and salaries of senior mistresses and head-mistresses, the
Committee endeavoured to preserve a standard relationship with
the men's salaries.
I think the Committee's recommendations, which are
shown in detail on page 28 of their Report, have gone a good
way to meet the complaints. There are some of the mistresses
who demand recognition of the principle of equal pay for equal
work, but the Hong Kong Government could hardly be asked to
concede a principle which is firmly resisted by the United Kingdom
authorities, and the relationship between the men's and women's
salaries existing before 1936 has now been substantially
restored. The graduate mistresses have also a special grievance
of their own as they claim that non-graduates are not only
treated on the same terms but have an advantage because they
enter the service normally earlier and therefore have a better
chance of the senior posts. I have considered this carefully,
however, and do not feel able to make any differentiation between graduates and non-graduates: the assumption regarding chances of promotion does not accord with the facts.
As
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.